THEME 1,068 OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT: ANALYSIS OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PRINCIPLES OF THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF VERDICTS

Authors

  • MARIANA PETERSEN ALONSO Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ

Abstract

This study examines the Provisional Execution of criminal sentences, with a particular focus on the jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) over the years, in light of the principle of the presumption of innocence. The objective is to analyze the jurisprudential shifts and the apparent conflict between the positions established in the Direct Actions of Constitutionality (ADCs) 43, 44, and 54, and the thesis consolidated in STF Theme 1,068. To this end, the research draws on legal doctrine, academic articles, monographs, legislation, and case law. Accordingly, this paper discusses the main aspects related to the topic.

Author Biography

MARIANA PETERSEN ALONSO, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ

Bacharel em direito, graduada pela Universidade do Estado Do Rio De Janeiro – UERJ (2020). Pós-graduada em Direito Processual Penal (IBMEC- SP) e em Ciências Criminais (CERS). Advogada. Email:
marianap.alonso@hotmail.com

Published

2025-09-16

How to Cite

PETERSEN ALONSO, M. (2025). THEME 1,068 OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT: ANALYSIS OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PRINCIPLES OF THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF VERDICTS. REVISTA JURÍDICA - DIREITO, JUSTIÇA, FRATERNIDADE & SOCIEDADE, 1(4), 43–53. Retrieved from https://revista.sentencadozero.com/index.php/rjsdz/article/view/334

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Revista Jurídica Volume 1 Edição Extra 4 de 2025

Section

Artigos